Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science:eISSN 2384-4272 pISSN 2384-4353

Table. 3.

Comparison between zirconia and titanium abutments

Authors Title Year of publication Summary
Glauser R, et al.42 Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study 2004 Long-term stability and biocompatibility of zirconia abutments in the anterior esthetic region
- Aesthetic excellence and stability
- Exceptional biocompatibility
Alsahhaf A, et al.43 Fracture resistance of zirconia-based implant abutments after artificial longterm aging 2017 Comparison of fracture resistance between zirconia and titanium abutments
- Titanium abutments generally exhibit superior flexural strength and fracture resistance
Truninger TC, et al.44 Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation 2012 Comparison of bending moments between zirconia and titanium abutments across different connection types
- Titanium abutments demonstrate greater flexural strength
J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2025;41:1-10 https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2025.41.1.1
© 2025 J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci