Analysis of microgap causing factors according to the substructure of internal abutment
| Authors | Title | Year of publication | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saidin S, et al.18 | Effects of different implant-abutment connections on micromotion and stress distribution: prediction of microgap formation | 2012 | Evaluation of micromovements based on rotational resistance - Internal hexagonal abutment has less micromovements than the internal conical abutment |
| Tsuruta K, et al.19 | The influence of implant-abutment connection on the screw loosening and microleakage | 2018 | Characteristics of internal conical abutment - Excellent mechanical stability with a large contact area (Less screw loosening) - Compressive fit |
