Differences in tooth scoring results between groups were analyzed based on the type of practice media used during tooth carving practice
| Score | Group | N | Mean | SD | Median | Mean rank | Rank sum | U | Z | Effect size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS | G1 | 50 | 70.28 | 4.84 | 88.00 | 25.57 | 1278.50 | 3.500 | -8.102 | 0.000 | 0.997 |
| G2 | 40 | 88.33 | 5.21 | 71.00 | 70.41 | 2816.50 |
G1: In 2021, a group of students engaged in tooth carving practice using a conventional textbook, G2: In 2022, a group of students engaged in tooth carving practice using an augmented reality mobile application that provided a step-by-step guide, N: number of carved tooth, M: mean, SD: standard deviation, TS: The total score of 100 point is derived from the sum of nine scoring items, namely S1 to S9.
*
