Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science:eISSN 2384-4272 pISSN 2384-4353

Table. 4.

Table. 4.

Case II patient’s pre- and post-treatment cephalometric analysis. It shows dental change of both incisors but skeletal pattern was not changed significantly

MeasurementMeanInitialFinal
SNA (°)82.578.6*78.6*
SNB (°)80.474.9*74.9*
ANB (°)2.13.73.7
FMA (°)22.734.0**33.1**
FMIA (°)60.755.664.7
IMPA (°)96.690.482.3**
L1 to APo (mm)4.69.5**5.3
U1 to FH (°)116.3120.0118.7
U1 to SN (°)108.7106.2104.9
IIA (°)124.4115.7*126.0

, 1 standard deviation; **, 2 standard deviation.

SNA, the angle of sella-nasion-A point; SNB, the angle of sella- nasion-B point; ANB, the angle of A point-nasion-B point; FMA, Frankfort mandibular plane angle; FMIA, Frankfort mandibular inci- sor angle; IMPA, the angle of the lowermost tangent to the mandible and the long axis of mandibular incisors; L1 to APo, linear distance from tip of lower incisor to A point to pogonion line; U1 to FH, the angle of the long axis of maxillary central incisors between Frank- fort plane; U1 to SN, the angle of the long axis of maxillary central incisors between sella-nasion plane; IIA, interincisal angle.

J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2019;35:260-9 https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.4.260
© 2019 J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci